Malthus, medicine, and morality
نویسنده
چکیده
together, the whole of this book is much greater than the sum of the eleven articles. This is not just because Hunter has slightly amended the original papers to add cross-references to the others, although this is undoubtedly useful, and off-sets the inevitable repetition resulting from their original composition as separate pieces. The book is greater than the sum of its parts becauseHunter sees it as a model for something much more ambitious than a study of one "great man" in the history of science. Hunter sees it as a model of how intellectual history should be written (p. 14). What this amounts to, and the origins of this idea can be traced back far earlier in Hunter's work, is a belief in the value of collective biographies, but now conceived on a grand scale. The approach Hunter has in mind is a long way from the collective biography of the fellows he saw himself as presenting in his early study of the Royal Society (The Royal Society and its fellows, 1660-1700, 1982, and 1994). Hunter is now calling for a collection made up of Boswellian biographies. "Primarily," he writes, "I see intellectual history as comprising the study of individual reactions to common problems: hence the best route to a proper understanding of intellectual change in any period seems to me to be an intensive scrutiny of the intellectual personality of each thinker, drawing on all available sources in an essentially biographical manner" (pp. 223-4). There is something essentially Baconian in Hunter's vision of intellectual history; perhaps the result of working so long on the supreme Baconian philosopher. "We cannot afford to pick and choose the aspects we study of a figure like Boyle", Hunter writes, "only by tracking him as a whole will we understand him" (p. 153). Reading this collection it is easy to be carried along by the author's mastery of his subject, in which different facets of Boyle are revealed in successive papers and continually reflect upon other facets revealed in other papers. The result is undoubtedly a brilliant and fascinating gem, but it is hard to believe that all other historical figures are susceptible to the same treatment, or that all intellectual historians are capable of pursuing it.
منابع مشابه
Automated detection of micro-organisms in blood cultures by means of the Malthus Microbiological Growth Analyser.
A prototype Malthus Microbiological Growth Analyser was compared with conventional methods for examining blood cultures in a trial of 651 cultures mostly from patients with haematological malignancy or undergoing haemodialysis or renal transplantation. Of 100 significantly positive cultures, organisms from 82 grew in the conventional aerobic (+ CO2) bottle, 78 in the conventional anaerobic bott...
متن کاملHow “moral” are the principles of biomedical ethics? – a cross-domain evaluation of the common morality hypothesis
BACKGROUND The principles of biomedical ethics - autonomy, non-maleficence, beneficence, and justice - are of paradigmatic importance for framing ethical problems in medicine and for teaching ethics to medical students and professionals. In order to underline this significance, Tom L. Beauchamp and James F. Childress base the principles in the common morality, i.e. they claim that the principle...
متن کاملAutomated screening of blood cultures with the Malthus microbiological growth analyser.
A total of 3347 blood cultures from patients in all hospital wards were examined on a Malthus microbiological growth analyser and by a conventional system. There was no significant difference in the total numbers of positive cultures of clinical importance between the two systems (p greater than 0.05). Staphylococcus aureus, however, was isolated more often by the conventional method (p less th...
متن کاملA method in search of a purpose: the internal morality of medicine.
I begin this commentary with an expanded typology of theories that endorse an internal morality of medicine. I then subject these theories to a philosophical critique. I argue that the more robust claims for an internal morality fail to establish a stand-alone method for bioethics because they ignore crucial non-medical values, violate norms of justice and fail to establish the normativity of m...
متن کاملThe hedgehog and the Borg: common morality in bioethics.
In this commentary, I critically discuss the respective views of Gert and Beauchamp-Childress on the nature of so-called common morality and its promise for enriching ethical reflection within the field of bioethics. Although I endorse Beauchamp and Childress' shift from an emphasis on ethical theory as the source of moral norms to an emphasis on common morality, I question whether rouging up c...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Medical History
دوره 46 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2002